Nasa Announces Another Planet Found!

NASA scientists said they discovered a fifth planet orbiting a star
outside our own solar system and say the discovery suggests there are many
solar systems that are, just like our own, packed with planets.
 

The new planet is much bigger than Earth, but is a similar distance
away from its sun, a star known as 55 Cancri, the astronomers said on
Tuesday.
       The discovery marks the first time as many as five planets have
been found
  Life could conceivably live on the surface of a moon that might be
orbiting the new planet, but such a moon would be far too small to detect
using current methods, the astronomers said.
  “The star of this new solar is very much like our own sun. It has
about the same mass and is about the same age as our sun.
SO it seems that the chance of life on a other planet keeps growing
and growing.
And the fact the our solar system  is still  a young system
they may well  be solar systems 100s of thousands years older than
ours, and with technology 100s of thousands of years more advance than ours.
            This  new solar system is also said to be about 41 light
years away ,which  is also the distance the supposed ebens that are rumored
to have contact with our government since 1947
(hhmmmm, interesting)

PROJECT “SERPO”

I was looking at a this site on ufo declassified info and all i can say is its totally awesome!
 
Transcript of classified tape recording made at Camp David, Maryland during a presidential briefing regarding the subject of UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS and EXTRATERRESTRIAL VISITATION of EARTH. President RONALD REAGAN was present.
The recording was made between March 6 and 8, 1981.WILLIAM CASEY: Mr President, good morning. As we discussed in February, this briefing contains some very sensational and some very, very classified information.
I am not sure, oh, well, I’m not going to make a decision on who you want in the room. That will be your decision, Mr President. This will be a real tough one to follow since the briefing starts back, historically speaking, that is, and runs up to recent times.
I believe we have prepared a good chronological order of events. I’m sure you, Mr President, will have many questions.

The list of questions presented to me by ADVISER #2 should all be answered during this briefing. I hope they are, more than anyone, especially you, Mr President, leave this briefing with questions still unanswered.
I have asked The Caretaker to conduct this briefing. He is a contract employee of the CIA and is the present custodian of the information. Are we to assume that everyone is present?

PRESIDENT: Well, it will be entirely up to you, Bill. I guess everyone must be cleared for this briefing of information, is that not correct?

WM CASEY: Well, it appears everyone is, but as you will see Mr President, this stuff is pretty high up on the food chain. We call it ATS or “Above Top Secret.” This stuff has its own classification and markings.
We have a special container, special printers and copiers for this stuff. Every word of this material is printed on special paper then placed inside special covers.
The caretakers have taken special efforts to protect all of this stuff from being released inadvertently or copied by some unauthorized person.

But all of this material is protected by a special group of people. The Caretaker is in charge of protecting this information and all of the other stuff associated with this information. I would prefer that you, Mr President, decide on who you want in this room. Remember, this material is a closely guarded secret.
Although the gist of the story has been out there for many years, very little of the ACTUAL TRUTH has ever been released to the public.
Oh, yes, well, by some of the renegades maybe, but many of them have been discredited.

PRESIDENT: OK, Bill, I guess we need ADVISER #1, you, ADVISER #3 and Caspar here. I think ADVISER #2 and Michael can leave.

ADVISER #2: Mr President, excuse me, but I would prefer to leave. I don’t wish to know this information. You know, plausible denial or something like that.

MICHAEL DEAVER: Mr President, whatever you wish, I’ll do. It would be an interesting subject, but do I really have a need to know? No, I don’t think so.

PRESIDENT: OK, I guess that is it.
WM CASEY: Thank you, Mr President. I will now turn the briefing over to The Caretaker.

ADVISER #3: Mr President, and Mr Director, I already had this briefing. I can stay or leave. Secretary Weinberger and myself received this a few weeks ago.

SECRETARY WEINBERGER: Mr President, as you know, we have some pending business regarding that Soviet problem in Berlin. I think we might just handle that. ADVISER #3 and I will let you close this meeting to just a few.

PRESIDENT: OK, Casp, I guess you and ADVISER #3 can leave. Thanks for coming.

WM CASEY: OK, Mr President, that certainly narrows the audience. I think this is just right.

PRESIDENT: OK, well, I can’t wait to hear this. Let’s proceed.
The CARETAKER: Good morning, Mr President. First of all, I would like to give you a bit of information on my background.
But before that, please, Mr President, if you have questions during this briefing, just interrupt me, sir. I have been employed by the CIA for the past 31 years. I started the caretaking status of this project in 1960.
We have a special group of people whom we call “Group 6,” that cares for all this information.

PRESIDENT: Good morning, I hope, well, I believe I will ask questions. Bill briefed me back in January, but I’m not sure … huh … well, was it detailed, no, I don’t think so … huh … OK, well I’m sure Bill didn’t tell me all ’cause we only had about one hour.

WM CASEY: Mr President, I only gave you a quick briefing for the NSDD (National Security Decision Directives) that we want to incorporate into the overall action directives about this subject.
ADVISER #3, Caspar and I have details far beyond what I knew before January. The last administration wasn’t too keen on making all of this stuff accessible to us during the briefings in November and December.

PRESIDENT: Well, I knew a little about this subject before. Back in 1970. Nixon had all of the good stuff and wanted to share it with some of his friends. Nixon showed me some papers. Not sure about who authored them, but they … huh … well something about New Mexico and other places. Nixon was pretty … huh … well, you know, fascinated with it.
He showed me something, some kind of object or device that came from one of their craft.
Something that was taken from the New Mexico crash site. I don’t know if, well … huh … do we know what it was? I don’t think we knew or maybe now, after 11 years, we might know.

The CARETAKER: Mr President, I can answer some of those questions. Do you wish for me to begin?
PRESIDENT: Oh, well, what level is this? I mean, what was it called? I don’t remember what they called this.

WM CASEY: Mr President, codeword. It’s called Top Secret Codeword. This information is beyond Top Secret as I said before. It has its own classification. It is very compartmentalized.
see the full story at      http//.www.serpo.org                                                                     

The “ROSWELL INCIDENT” 1947

Over 60 years something unidentified crashed in a place just out side of a place called Roswell. But what exactly happened all those years ago?
If you belive the Military authorities ,it was just a experimental weather ballon.But many witnesses and ufo investagators belive it was much more than that
One of most convinceing arguements that is was in fact a ufo,is the fact that Military authorities at first released dureing a press confrence that they in fact had in thier possission a crashed flying saucer
but the very next day retracted the statement and said it was just a weather ballon and that Major Marcel(a milatary aircraft expert) had made a misidenification.

The story actually starts in july 1947 when a sheep rancherby the name of William W. “Mac” Brazel was making his rounds of the Foster Ranch, located near Corona.
Brazel, home for the night, was listening to a roaring thunderstorm, not uncommon for his location, but this night it seemed worse than ever. He thought that maybe he had heard an explosion. The next morning, he was out again, checking the livestock, and riding along the fence to check for breaks
Ayoung boy about 7 years was with him.
as they rode into an open field they noticed alot of strange shiney debri scattered about.
Brazel collected some of the shiney unknown debris, and showed it George Wilcox, of the Chaves County Sheriff’s Office.
Wlicox called Major Jesse A. Marcel, who was at the Roswell Army Air Field and told Major Marcel about the debri.
Major Marcel first spoke to Brazel,then Marcell went to the debris field, along with him was Army Counter Intelligence Corps officer Sheridan Cavitt and Brazel. Marcell related the events of the search through the debris in his own words:

“When we arrived at the crash site, it was amazing to see the vast amount of area it covered… it scattered over an area of about three quarters of a mile long, I would say, and fairly wide, several hundred feet wide. It was definitely not a weather or tracking device, nor was it any sort of plane or missile.”
Marcel examined the strange material, took some of it home with him and showed his son . He informed Air Force officials of what he had seen, and Colonel Blanchard gave an order to Colonel Walter Haut, instructing him to inform the media that the Air Force had in its possession a “crashed saucer.”
Haut claimed that the saucer debris was sent to the 8th Air Force, under the leadership of General Ramey in Ft. Worth, Texas. Meanwhile, the famous newspaper headlines were released:

“RAAF Captures Flying Saucer on Ranch in Roswell Region.”

the milatary later retracted the statement and issued a second state saying it was just a downed “weather ballon”
But heres some of the problems with the milatarys stand on this.;
First how can Major (Marcel) make a error like that?(and just for the record Marcel later claimed that he was froced to retract theflying saucer statement by his supiors and even wrote a book about it)
Marcel’s son claims that the weather ballon that was shown at the second press release was not what his dad had shown him.
And later there were many other wittnesses that later came forward saying that they had iether saw alien bodies or parts of alien space craft and were threaten by the authorities not to speak of it.
One thing is for certain about “The Roswell Incident” something major did happen there in 1947,and the milatary is definatley covering something up.

.

The Famous Trent Sighting.

On May 11, 1950, at around 7:45 pm, Mrs. On May 11, 1950, at around 7:45 pm, Mrs. Trent was outside feeding her animals when she saw a very bright, metallic object in the sky approaching her farm.
She called to her husband Mr. Trent who did not respond.
She anxiously ran into the house to get a him and to get her camera. After finding her husband and camera, Mr. and Mrs. Trent returned outside just in time to snap two photographs of the UFO as it accelerated and sped away to the northwest.
The Photo that the Trents took that day  has never been explained,even after expert examination.

Billy Meier Alien Contacts

Rendlesham Forest incident

I found this article at  http://www.nickpope.net
Introduction

on the Rendlesham Forest incident, I’ve found myself on the receiving end of numerous questions concerning the papers:
Did they prove that in my previous statements on the case I’d withheld information from ufologists?
Was I implicated in a cover-up? Had I seen all of the papers? Had I been involved in the decision to release them?
Sceptics and believers alike trawled through my previous comments on the case, and I found myself quoted, misquoted and selectively quoted. Everyone, so it seemed, had an opinion or an agenda.
But what was the truth? In this article I’ll address all these issues and offer a personal view on what is already proving to be the biggest and most significant ufological story in many years.

I should first pay tribute to Lord Hill-Norton and Georgina Bruni, whose tireless efforts over the last few years have culminated in the release of these documents. Whether you’re a sceptic or a believer, anyone with a genuine interest in ufology should applaud the hard work that these two dedicated individuals have done, in their quest for the truth.

I will not go into a detailed summary or analysis of the documents themselves, because this has already been done by Georgina Bruni in her comprehensive article in the September edition of UFO Magazine, and in the various newspaper, television and radio interviews that she carried out after having broken the story.
Instead, I’ll confine myself to observations based on my personal involvement with this case.
These detailed comments about the files are doubtless difficult to follow, but I think it’s important to set out some information concerning the way in which MOD files are opened, managed, closed and archived.
If it’s any consolation, I’ve worked for the MOD for over 16 years now and I still find this sort of thing confusing! Conspiracy theorists are driven to distraction by the complexities of the MOD filing system, but what they often see as evidence of a cover-up is generally only proof of civil service bureaucracy. On this, the sceptics and I agree.

The MOD documents completely demolish one enduring ufological myth, which is the theory that DS8 and its successor Sec(AS) acted only as a “shop window”, dealing with public sightings and correspondence only, while military UFO sightings were investigated by shadowy branches that carried out secret research which those in the secretariat had no need to know, and no security clearance to see.
I’ve always said that this was nonsense, and I’m pleased that the files now prove I’m right. They clearly show that the secretariat acts as the lead department and tasks various specialist divisions to check points of detail relating to their specific areas of expertise.
So if anything, these specialist branches have a subordinate role to the secretariat. It was curious that a handful of believers and sceptics found some common ground here and seemed genuinely to believe that Sec(AS) were somehow “out of the loop”, acting as little more than a public relations office that carried out low level clerical tasks. The newly released documents set the record straight on this point.
Do I Remember All These Documents?
This is almost impossible for me to answer, given that I last saw the various UFO files over seven years ago.
I’m very suspicious when people claim perfect recollection of official documents, years after their involvement.
While I recognise most of them, I can’t swear that I recall every single one. Similarly, I’m pretty sure that I recall other Rendlesham documents that aren’t yet in the public domain. I’m trying to recall the details of these, but again I’m not sure about this and obviously couldn’t talk about such matters anyway, at least until an official decision to release them has been made.
Although most of the Rendlesham Forest documents that the MOD could locate have been released, five have been withheld because of exemptions to the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information. But aside from these withheld documents is the entirely separate issue of documents that were never on any of the files in the first place. As an example, I’m virtually certain that the individual statements taken or allegedly taken from key USAF witnesses Burroughs, Penniston, Cabansag, Buran and Chandler weren’t on any of the files I saw.
I’m pretty sure this means they were never passed to the MOD, although I can’t be sure on this point. The photographs taken by Master Sergeant Ray Gulyas the morning after the first incident (showing Captain Mike Verrano and PC Brian Creswell examining the landing site) were also almost certainly never forwarded. I definitely didn’t see them during my time in Sec(AS).
This may sound a bit vague, but I’m being asked to recall specific details of work I did seven years ago, when the Rendlesham Forest incident was already thirteen years in the past. It’s not an easy task.<br.The Defence Intelligence Staff<br.Some of the released documents are from the Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS) and this brings me to a difficult area. It will be no great surprise to those with a knowledge of the MOD that where I’ve previously referred to “specialist divisions” assisting me with UFO work, this included the DIS. The documents make it abundantly clear that with regard to Rendlesham, DS8 and the DIS worked hand in hand, freely sharing data in the course of the investigation. This certainly reflects what happened during my tour of duty in Sec(AS), from 1991 to 1994, when I would routinely liaise with these personnel, sharing data and ideas. But for reasons that I’m sure will be obvious, this was an area of my work that I could never previously have discussed with the media or the public.
It’s an area where I still can’t be wholly forthcoming, and where not everything that happens is written up on files. I don’t mean this to sound conspiratorial, and please don’t think that I’m hinting at a cover-up, because I’m not. I’m simply trying to explain that the MOD and the military do business in a way that few outsiders understand.
Now some DIS UFO documents have been released, I can confirm the basic fact of my involvement with this part of the Department.
But before they were released I could say nothing at all about such matters, and my original silence on the joint DS8/DIS/RAF investigation in the immediate aftermath of the incident is being interpreted as proof that either I wasn’t aware of this work or that I’d helped cover it up.
Anyone who knows anything about intelligence matters and the Official Secrets Act must realise that I had to follow the party line here and not discuss any aspect of the case that wasn’t yet in the public domain. The idea that I’d be able to casually discuss such matters during interviews with ufologists is farcical.
The Rawant now to offer some views on two key aspects of the case that have been further highlighted by the released documents. The first is the issue of the radiation readings taken at the landing site by Staff Sergeant Munro Nevilles, on the orders of Charles Halt.
When I reopened the investigation into the Rendlesham Forest incident in 1994 I contacted Giles Cowling at the Defence Radiological Protection Service (DRPS) and asked that he provide Sec(AS) with an assessment of the radiation readings recorded in Halt’s memo.
This assessment was that the readings were ten times what would be expected for the area concerned.
As I was subsequently to discover, this assessment was broadly similar to the original assessment from the DIS, which I hadn’t seen at the time.
Writing on 23 February 1981 R C Horscroft, ADI/DI52 said “The value of 0.1 milliroentgens (mr), I assume that this is per hour, seems significantly higher than the average background of about 0.015 mr”. questions have been raised about the readings in Halt’s memo. Maybe the dial was misread, and maybe the needle was waving around so much that an accurate measurement was impossible. Well, all I can say to that is “maybe”. But any official assessment has to be based on the data received.
It’s also been pointed out that the equipment used was not designed for the task. Short of suggesting that the USAF have a piece of kit designed specifically to measure radiation from UFOs, I’m not sure how to deal with such comments. Of course the equipment wasn’t designed for such a task, so of course it wasn’t ideal. But one can only use the equipment available, so again, we can only analyse the data we have, not the data we’d like to have.
I’ve previously assured people that the radiation at the landing site would have posed no danger to Halt and his team, or to those who subsequently visited the location.
Various sceptics have tried to spin this comment into my saying that the radiation readings were low.
What I actually said is that they were comparatively low and therefore harmless.
They are, however, as both the DIS and DRPS assessments make clear, significantly higher than would have expected. But as I’ve patiently explained to the likes of Ian Ridpath and Professor Frank Close, even this is not the key point.
The key point is that the readings peaked in the three depressions in the ground, in the centre of the triangle formed by these depressions, and on the side of one of the trees facing the landing site.
In any proper analysis of this, one has to go back to the raw data, and that means looking again at Halt’s memo and the new transcript of Halt’s tape that Georgina Bruni includes in her book, You Can’t Tell The People.
On this latter point, another interesting question is what happened to the various soil and sap samples that Halt had his team collect?
The Radar Evidence The second area where I want to offer some views based on my personal MOD experience relates to the radar data.
Radar is not infallible, and in chapter 4 . I explained some of the reasons why a blip on a radar screen does not necessarily indicate the presence of an object.
As examples, problems can occur in certain meteorological conditions and when two radar systems interfere with each other; and as with most technology, some bits of kit are more temperamental than others!
Georgina Bruni’s interview with former RAF radar operator Nigel Kerr (see pages 39 and 40 of You Can’t Tell The People) covered what happened when personnel in the Bentwaters tower contacted Eastern Radar at RAF Watton, explaining that they could see unidentified lights over the base. On checking his radar screen Kerr noticed a blip that stayed for three or four sweeps before disappearing. Such returns are not uncommon, and in themselves mean nothing.
But again, the sceptics miss the point, which is that the return was seen at exactly the same time and in exactly the same location as the unidentified light seen in the sky by military personnel at Bentwaters.What Next?
In her analysis of the documents Georgina Bruni drew attention to several questions that arise from the files, including the following:
Why did General Gabriel (Commander-in-Chief, United States Air Forces in Europe) visit Bentwaters early in 1981, so soon after his official visit on 3 December 1980, and why does it seem that both Gordon Williams and Donald Moreland were unaware of the visit?
Who handed General Gabriel the tape recordings of Charles Halt’s encounter, was any other material handed over, and what subsequent analysis and investigation was carried out by USAFE?
And if the tape recording in the public domain is only an edited extract of Halt’s recordings, what’s happened to the rest of it?
Was the DI52 offer to follow-up their initial assessment of the radiation readings taken up? If it was, was a site visit made, and what conclusions were reached?
If the offer wasn’t followed-up, what was the reason, given the DI52 view that the readings were “significantly higher than the average background”?
With the release of the Rendlesham files Georgina Bruni has achieved a significant breakthrough for ufology.
She’s following up the questions detailed in the previous paragraph with various MOD, RAF and USAF contacts, and I know that other researchers have built upon her work and are making their own enquiries.
Stand by for further revelations.The Rendlesham documents reveal important facts about the case, and will have given fresh encouragement to ufologists as they seek to explain Britain’s most famous UFO mystery.
There’s still much work to be done, but now so many of the official papers have been released, further investigation should be easier.
The incident itself
see this full article at   http://www.nickpope.net

HALO 3

Very Interesting UFO Story!

Found this story and pics intrigueing!

Here is the breif introduction. I’m using the alias Isaac, and used to work in what was called the CARET program in the 80’s.
During my time there, I worked with a lot of the technology that is clearly at work in the recent drone/strange craft sightings, most notably the “language” and diagrams seen on the underside of each craft.
What follows is a lengthy letter about who I am, what I know, and what these sightings are (probably) all about Here is the breif introduction. I’m using the alias Isaac, and used to work in what was called the CARET program in the 80’s.
During my time there, I worked with a lot of the technology that is clearly at work in the recent drone/strange craft sightings, most notably the “language” and diagrams seen on the underside of each craft.
What follows is a lengthy letter about who I am, what I know, and what these sightings are (probably) all about….
see the whole article here..

isaaccaret.fortunecity.com

Share:

Share

This is a link too http://alienx.blogspot.com/

Keep Watching The Skies!

Since the advancement of the digital age has come about there have been more ufo reports and more photos and digital recordings of ufos.
This is probabley because every household now almost always has both a digital camera(or sometimes 2 like me:) ) and a digital camcorder and telescopes.
But now the question is.. are there more recordings of ufos because more people have digital cameras and recorders and more people are watching the skys,
or are there just more fakes and hoaxs because the digital age has made it easier to fake film footage and photos.
I personelly think its a bit of both, but unfortunely the hoaxers makes any chance of ufo film footages impossible to be taken seriously without extremete scrutiny,
and even if the footage is cuncluded real and untouched people will still claim it was just a good fake.
Yes in this day and age with our digital technology its easy for almost any one with a little computer savy and digital recording experience to make a good hoax photo or recording.
But there has been some recording that even the experts consider legitamate..Could a hoaxer be better than film experts?maybe,but unlikely.
so yes there are many frauds and hoaxs out there,i do belive there are a few real ones too.so keep those digital cameras trained on the stars and maybe one day you will get the conclusive evidence of a ufo!!! (or automatically dubbed a hoaxer lol)